1. Short covering from a severely depressed psychology, and
2. The debt-fueled electroshock the Chinese government is giving to its economy.
These are both true, but in my view they ignore the most important point: Many commodities had gotten to very cheap long-run levels. They were at levels which given time would lead to significant cuts in production or at least left no room for any production or consumption risks. Nickel (my largest position) is the former. Soybeans (my second largest) is the latter.
This is really key for value-biased strategists like me. At some points you don't have to anticipate a catalyst. If you can buy it cheaply enough, you can just stay with it, knowing that the catalyst will eventually come. This time it's the Chinese electroshock. Who knows what the next one will be?
What am I doing here? I did cut back on beans a bit, mostly by rotating some into corn and also selling some OTM calls. Keeping the nickel.
One of the pieces I posted here and on Seeking Alpha was my view that the bottom in commodities was basically in, and that I would be trading from the long side for the next few years. I got a fair bit of blowback on it from various traders (BTW, how do you guys get my phone number? I prefer you comment below.) The basic thrust of the criticism is that previous down cycles have taken many years to play out, and we are only partly into this one. I beg to differ. First off, the top in this cycle was in 2008 (using the IMF index as usual). So we are eight years into the down cycle. Second, there are shorter cycles within cycles that operate on the span we consider here, two to seven years.
I'm going to write a long piece on this for next week. In the meantime, look at this chart of inflation-adjusted copper prices going back to 1913 with 2016=100.0. See if you can spot the cycles I'm talking about.
|Copper in 2016 Cents / lb.|